Double Empathy Problem in Families
Understanding the bi-directional mismatch in perspective and communication between neurodivergent children or parents and their neurotypical family members.
What Is the Double Empathy Problem?
For many years, the field of psychiatry claimed that autistic individuals "lacked empathy." However, in 2012, autistic sociologist Dr. Damian Milton introduced the theory of the Double Empathy Problem, shifting this perspective. Milton argues that communication and empathy breakdowns are not a one-sided deficit, but rather a bi-directional difficulty experienced when two groups with completely different operating systems and lived experiences attempt to interact.
In other words, a neurotypical individual struggles to understand the inner world, expressions, and communication style of an autistic person just as much as the autistic person struggles to interpret the neurotypical. The issue does not lie within the individuals themselves, but in the interface between them. They are like two people who believe they speak the same language but are actually using completely different dialects.
---
Mismatches in Family Dynamics
The double empathy problem can manifest most painfully within families. Communication and perspective mismatches between neurotypical parents and neurodivergent children, or between relatives and the immediate family, often run deep:
1. Body Language Misinterpretation: A neurodivergent child who avoids eye contact, turns away while listening, or hand-flaps (stimming) is often perceived by neurotypical relatives as being "disrespectful" or "disengaged." In reality, the child is filtering out visual stimuli to process auditory information more effectively.
2. Directness and Lack of Social Scripting: The direct, honest communication style of neurodivergent individuals, which avoids hints and hidden meanings, is frequently labeled as "rude" or "insensitive" due to unspoken family social codes.
3. Invalidating Sensory Needs: A child's extreme aversion to certain food textures at family dinners, or their desire to escape loud gatherings, is often dismissed as "stubbornness" or "poor parenting." As pediatric psychologist Dr. Mona Delahooke notes, these are not behavioral acts of defiance, but survival (threat) responses from an overloaded nervous system.
---
Building Two-Way Bridges in the Family
To protect family relationships and build a safe home environment, bi-directional steps should be taken:
Make Intentions Explicit: Remove assumptions from your communication. Prefacing statements with your intent helps prevent misunderstandings: "I am not asking this to disagree with you, I just want to understand..." or "I am looking away to help myself listen, but I hear everything you are saying."
Reframe Behaviors Neurologically: Stop viewing your child's or partner's behaviors through the lens of "they are doing this to provoke me." An irritable child is often not defiant, but sensory overloaded.
Accept Sensory Limits: When planning family gatherings, designate a quiet "safe zone" where neurodivergent family members can retreat. Respect differences in social battery capacities, and agree that leaving a gathering early is a matter of self-care rather than a sign of personal offense.